The post in which I felt like a member of the “Dragons’ Den”.
Tuesday, 29 March 2016
Module 10: Kickstart Me Up
Sunday, 27 March 2016
Module 10: Co-Creation or Crowdsourcing
Module 10: Co-Creation or Crowdsourcing: Moving Beyond Multiple Choice |
Monday, March 28, 2016 - Sunday, April 3, 2016
|
Wednesday, 23 March 2016
Assignment 5 - Support the philatelic community’s inclusion in plan for a better postal service
Canadians
care about the management of their postal services. Susan Dixon’s “Don’t let Canada Post end door-to-door delivery” has so far registered 232,269 supporters
on Change.org.
My petition
is not meant as a rebuttal to or protest against the plan recently released by
the Canadian Union of Postal Workers
(CUPW) for “A Better Public PostalService for Everyone!” It is meant to provide a suggestion to strengthen it by
including a group of stakeholders who were left out of the planning, although
they have been important contributors to the long-term economic sustainability
of Canada Post – the philatelic community which comprises of many different
stakeholders including stamp collectors. In 2003, Kevin Brooker reports in
Applied Arts that “according to Alain Leduc […] stamp manager of Canada Post
[…] our national stamp program is as strong as ever. Although the crown
corporation is guarded about its budget and revenues, a lot of stamps are still
getting made. […] Remarkably, he says that somewhere between 40 and 50 percent
of them are bought by collectors here and, increasingly, abroad” (Brooker,
2003, p. 32).
The CUPW
plan is a work in progress and there is an opportunity for the philatelic
community to be involved. As a signatory
to the Leap Manifesto, I was in fact excited when a friend mentioned to me that
CUPW’s plan was publicly supported by Naomi Klein and her colleagues for the
environmental ideas it put forward, since I had always personally struggled
with the size of the carbon footprint of snail mail and the postal industry. I
was also annoyed at the fact that the popular self-adhesive stamps that are now
commonplace are harmful to the environment. This is why the tone adopted in my
petition is one that is asking to be included in future conversations rather
then reprimanding for having been left out.
Image 1.
Recent hand cancellation in black grease crayon by either Canadian or Belgian
postal worker. An unnecessary gesture as we can see that the stamps were
already cancelled and postmarked.
I am not
myself a stamp collector, but I purchase stamps to put on postcards I send
abroad as a member of an international postcard club and online community
called Postcrossing.com. I have always
liked postcards, as far back as I can remember. As a history buff and a fan of
“mail art” who has worked and lived abroad, I was always fascinated by aspects
of the philatelic tradition that we seemed to be missing out on here at home.
In a private group on Facebook comprising over 900 Francophone postcard enthusiasts,
I realized that a common topic of discussion was the lack of philatelic
literacy, awareness and sensitivity regarding the hobby of letter-writing and
stamp collecting of some (fortunately not all) front-line postal workers here
in Canada and abroad. Complaints covered practices from folding oversized
envelopes in two to fit through a mailbox slot to cancelling collectible stamps
with felt pens or destroying them in the postal service’s processing centres.
These complaints often led to deeper discussions on how the philatelic
community felt left out of the dialogue about the future of the postal service
or the process of making business decisions (such as the impact of adopting
self-adhesive stamps) that dramatically affect their hobby, which has a history
stretching back to the inception of the service itself. It was therefore no
surprise that in the CUPW document, they were not considered.
Since any
petition must have a focus, I was not able to include many of the important
issues related to the daily operations of our postal services and for that
matter to the public, including the stakeholders concerned in my petition. For example, choosing a stamp image entails a
great responsibility and involves important issues with respect to identity
politics (Keith, 2006; Maloney, 2013). Choosing the images on stamps in Canada
is the responsibility of Canada Post’s Stamp Advisory Committee. An alternative
would be to address a more specific petition to the Director of Stamp Products
at Canada Post, asking that going forward, more women, Indigenous individuals,
and New Canadians be represented on Canadian stamps. This would follow in the
footsteps of a successful petition initiated by Merna Forster of Victoria,
asking the Bank of Canada to add women from Canadian history to Canadian banknotes. To date it has obtained 73, 202 signatures.
Image 2: Preserving the poles, Canada Post supporting the fight against climate change as part of a worlwide initiative.
One
argument that I wish I would have made more persuasively is that stamps are
miniature works of art and marvels of craftsmanship; their inherent beauty and
their longevity appeal to artists and designers alike. The aforementioned
article in Applied Arts is really worth a read. It can be found in and
retrieved from the University of Alberta Library catalogue.
Overall,
this first experience of writing an online petition has been difficult, insofar
as putting one’s name out there on behalf of a large community of stakeholders
involves a whole other level of commitment requiring the willingness to be held
accountable in many ways for the petition’s outcomes. Fortunately, I felt that
the conversations I had with key stakeholders in this community, as exemplified
in the petition, helped me help a community that often feels voiceless to speak
its mind.
References
Bank of
Canada: Add women from Canadian history to Canadian bank notes
Retrieved
from
(https://www.change.org/p/bank-of-canada-add-women-from-canadian-history-to-canadian-bank-notes)
Brooker, K.
(2003, September/October). Mail Calls. Applied Arts Magazine, 28(4), 30-41.
Canada
(https://www.postcrossing.com/country/CA)
Dobson, H.
(2005). The Stamp of Approval: Decision-Making Processes and Policies in Japan
and the UK. East Asia, 22 (2), 56-76.
DOI:10.1007/s12140-005-0009-3
Don’t let
Canada Post end door-to-door delivery (https://www.change.org/p/don-t-let-canada-post-end-door-to-door-delivery)
Jeffrey, K.
(2006). Crown, Communication and the Colonial Post: Stamps, The Monarchy and
the British Empire. The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 34 (1),
45-70.
DOI:10.1080/03086530500411290
Lammam,
C. & Karabegovic, A. (2011,
September/October). Recent mail disruption strengthens case to privatize Canada
Post. Fraser Forum, 12-13. Retrieved from:
https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/fraserforum-september-october-2011.pdf
The Leap
Manifesto: A Call for a Canada Based on Caring for the Earth and One Another
(https://leapmanifesto.org/en/the-leap-manifesto/)
Mah, M.
(2006, June). Can’t be licked. Quill & Quire, 72 (5), p. 13
Maloney, M.
(2013). “One of the best advertising mediums the country can have:” Postage
Stamps and National Identity in Canada, New Zealand and Australia. Material
Culture Review. 77/78 (Spring/Fall 2013), p. 21-38.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)